Biden Wants To Pack The Court. Court Doesn’t Agree

Joe Biden this past week signed yet another Executive Order that establishes a commission to look into whether or not the Congress should put together approval to add justices to the United States Supreme Court. The commission has to study the issue and report back to Biden in 180 days (6 months). Known as “court packing”, it hasn’t been attempted for the last 84 years. The last time it was attempted was also when a Democrat was in charge, FDR, and did so for pretty much the same reason. Back then, FDR was moving the country far to the left with socialist ideas and programs and the high court was knocking down a lot of what he wanted to do as unconstitutional. So, he tried to pack the court by adding liberal justices, thereby assuring that his ideas would get through.

It hasn’t been attempted since 1937.

Why is it being done today? Simple. Democrats are in this hail Mary, squash the right mentality. They know that they own the Congress, and the White House, and if they change enough laws, and get the Supreme Court up to say, 15 jurists, they’ll have a majority in all three branches of government. Then they can do away with the filibuster, make Washington DC, and Puerto Rico a state to get more liberal Senators (they already have a vote scheduled for this coming week on DC statehood), and pass HR-1 which would basically give them free reign to own the voting system in every state by nationalizing the voting laws, and making mail-in ballots at least easy, if not mandatory. It would make their attempts to defraud elections so much easier.

Well, what does the Supreme Court thing about all of this?

I’m not sure what most of the nine jurists on the high court think. I can tell you what one thinks. He thinks it stinks. And he’s not some super-conservative Brett Kavanaugh type of justice either. It’s liberal Stephen Breyer!

Breyer was giving a speech at Harvard Law this past week and said that he felt packing the court would do irreparable harm to the government. He stated that the court’s authority depends on  “a trust that the court is guided by legal principle, not politics. Structural alteration motivated by the perception of political influence can only feed that latter perception, further eroding that trust.”

But wait…there’s more.

The late (some say great), Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who was about as socialist and liberal as one could get didn’t like the idea either. She said it “would make the court appear partisan” and destroy the public’s confidence in the court’s credibility, and therefore the court itself. It would be one side saying, ‘When we’re in power, we’re going to enlarge the number of judges so we’ll have more people who will vote the way we want them to.'” Interesting that two of the most liberal justices in the history of the Supreme Court agree that what Biden is doing is out of bounds and bad for America!

Now, if Clarence Thomas, or Neal Gorsuch, or Kavanaugh had said that, I’d probably say it was a difference in political ideas. But Breyer is a liberal through and through. He’s probably next to Elena Kagan, the most liberal justice on the high court. And he’s totally against expanding the court just to get a political advantage.

So it becomes clear what the Dems are doing. Take over all three branches of government in a bloodless-coup and rule forever to make America a socialist dynasty. There is one problem with that. America does not want to become a socialist country. Most Americans (73%) say they don’t want to be socialist. And of the 27% that are either undecided or in favor of it, if they actually lived under such a regime, I doubt they’d be a fan of it for long.

Socialism doesn’t work. Democrats aren’t that smart to understand that. It has never been successful at improving the lives of people anywhere in the world it’s ever been tried. Oh, some countries may have socialized programs here or there, but that’s a far cry from pure socialism. It doesn’t work, and it’s the one thing that is going to lead to the United States being sent down the tubes as a country.

Remember how great and powerful countries like Spain, England, Portugal, France, and Germany were? Remember how at times they ruled many different countries all over the world? What do they have today? They are feckless and weak. They have to come together as the European Union just to get recognized. Because individually, they don’t amount to squat, and that’s exactly what’s going to happen to the United States of America if Democrats succeed. They will be the cause of the downfall of our nation. And we have to stop it. The sooner, the better. It begins by taking away their power in Congress in 2022, and the White House in 2024. I’m sure they’ll get both back at some point in the future, but we can’t allow them to ever do what they are talking about doing now.

And Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, and Joe Biden/Kamala Harris are nothing more than enemies of the people.

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

4 thoughts on “Biden Wants To Pack The Court. Court Doesn’t Agree

  1. Just my opinion but…..if the Supreme Court would have heard the election cases where the various State officials went over the heads of their State legislature’s and changed the voting laws Biden wouldn’t even be in office!?!?! Those cases could only be heard by the Supreme Court and they were obligated to do so (Article III, Section 2)

    I’ve heard rumors that the reason the Supreme Court refused to hear those cases was because they were being threatened that if they did, the Dem’s would attempt to pack the court. And as usual, the Dem’s lied and are now going ahead with their plan anyway.

    Is it too late to bring another election fraud case before the Supreme court? They could save themselves. And if they can determine that the election was fixed while Joe is still in office I don’t think American’s will allow him to stay!?!? They found out about Kennedy way too late to do anything about it.


    1. Your suggestion has a couple of flaws in it. First of all, I haven’t heard anything, nor seen any proof that the Dems’ made that threat to the Supreme Court. Second, I find it very unlikely that such a move would jolt them into any action anyway, and finally, it’s never too late to bring a case before the Supreme Court. But you have to understand (and you do, I know), that the Supreme Court decides which cases to hear. It’s not like you can force them to do something they don’t want to do. It becomes a moot point, quite literally.


      1. Well, I can’t allow you get away with calling my suggestions “flawed” simply because you haven’t heard of them! The rumors about John Robert’s illegal adoption has been going on since 2005!

        And just what exactly would jolt the Supreme Court into not hearing the case when it was their Constitutional obligation under Original Jurisdiction to do so? There had to be some pretty strong reasons for the Supreme Court to violate it’s own Constitutional responsibilities?

        Reminds me of all the laws Jim Comey announced regarding the laws Hillary Clinton broke with her bathroom server but according to Jim Comey, no crime, no foul!

        Yeah, the Supreme Court decides what cases it will and will not hear, but if they refused to hear it the first time what makes anybody think they’ll take the case on a second go-around? Wouldn’t that expose their hypocrisy?

        Sidney Powell was correct when after the Supreme Court refused to hear the case she made the comment that now all three branches of government have been corrupted.

        “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s