Was The Stone Cased Biased?

I haven’t paid a lot of attention to the Roger Stone case, because as I researched it when it was happening, I found Stone to be pretty much a snake in the grass, and I know there are several Republicans and conservatives that have pretty much said the same thing. So, it was no surprise to me that he got convicted of that ubiquitous “Obstruction of Justice” charge and of course, lying to federal prosecutors and the FBI. Well, it turns out there may have been more to that story than was originally reported.

According to Fox News, and backed up by CNN, a former Memphis City Schools Board President by the name of Tomeka Hart was the foreperson on that jury. And according to what has been found out about her since the trial, she’s a huge Democrat, and has been, shall we politely call her an “activist” for the liberal side of things? And she’s a self-avowed “Never Trumper”.

Now wait a doggone minute here.

Apparently, there were several on the jury that were biased against any Republican administration officials. In fact, there was a former Obama press official that was on that jury. Stone’s defense team moved to strike the person because of their bias, and the judge, Amy Berman Jackson denied the request. So, I guess the question becomes, did this “snake in the grass” get a fair trial? And with all of the hollering that’s going on from the left over the Department of Justice’s decision to reduce the sentencing that they are asking for, I have the question…is there justice being done, or was Stone hung out to dry before the trial even started?

I’m not saying that the guy was innocent. I’m not saying he shouldn’t go to prison. I am however, wondering about the politics that played in to what should have been an fair and unbiased trial. Which brings me to the point of begging the question why the left seems hell bent on jumping all over Attorney General, William Barr’s case on this one for trying to lower a nine year sentence request from Justice. When you take into account that there could be a very real possibility that the jury, and possibly the judge in the case were biased against the defense, how could you whine about the actual sentencing…which Jackson is going to perform herself.

Is this yet another left-wing attempt to slant the system their way? Is it yet another futile attempt to get Donald Trump impeached for a second time? Adam Schiff was very quick to rush to the first microphone he found to declare that Trump was once again, abusing his power by trying to influencing the DOJ. Apparently that doesn’t hold water since the decision to seek a lower sentence for Stone was reached hours before Trump tweeted his thoughts.

And while we’re on the subject of “biased Attorney Generals”, can I bring up a couple of names? What about Janet “Branch Dividian” Reno? Are you telling me she wasn’t biased? How about in more recent times, Eric “Contempt Of Congress” Holder? You’re saying he played it right down the middle? And what about Loretta “Meet you on the tarmac” Lynch? Oh, there wasn’t any bias there, right?

When the left decides to get serious with their own Attorneys General about bias, I will start listening to them about William Barr. Until then,

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Double Standard

I don’t care what side of the political spectrum you are on. I don’t care what your views are about a certain topic. You are certainly entitled to whatever you believe. That’s a part of why we formed this country in the first place. And just because I believe one way, doesn’t mean I’m always right…although I’d argue that I am. And that’s ok. What’s not ok in this country?

Double standards.

They are all over the place. They’re in politics, where the rich and famous seem to literally get away with murder, while some ordinary Joe gets the death penalty. They’re in religion, where if you happen to be a leader of a church in one religion, violence and abuse are tolerated. If you happen to be a leader of a church in another religion, you are dealt with entirely differently.

And it happens in entertainment. If you are liberal and gay, you are dealt with one way, and if you’re conservative, you’re dealt with another. This is the tale of the entertainment double standard.

One one side you’ve got Jussie Smollett, who is a star on the Fox TV show, “Empire”. He’s liberal, and he’s gay. And though it hasn’t been proven yet, the accusation is that he paid some goons to beat him up while they were wearing a Make America Great Again hat. He’s turned himself in to police, and he’s been charge with a crime over the incident. So far, Smollett hasn’t lost his job with Empire.

On the other side you’ve got Roseanne Barr. She was the star of the surprise summer hit last summer, the reboot of “Roseanne”, that had basically the same cast as they had when the show first aired in 1988 through 1997. In case you forgot, Roseanne tweeted that Valerie Jarrett, Bobo Obama’s unpaid, unsolicited, unqualified adviser, was compared to a monkey. She was unceremoniously fired, even after apologizing. The reason? Well, it was rather blatant what she said (although I found it humorous), and she espoused the values of Donald Trump on her show. By the way, they tried to reboot the show without her, and it failed miserably.

Can you see the double standard? My question is, why did ABC fire Roseanne over her comment, which she apologized for, and Fox has not (yet) fired Smollett over his incident, which I really view as much more flagrant and damaging.

If the left wants to have power in this country, they need to adopt the mantra that “All men are created equal”, and I don’t use that in a gender-based form. EVERYBODY must face the same music. If you’re going to investigate Donald Trump, you most certainly should be investigating Hillary Clinton. If you’re going to fire Roseanne Barr, you should certainly fire Jussie Smollett. To not do those things is to create a separate class in our society whereby anything goes for them, but not for us. That’s called “justice for some”, and last I knew it was unconstitutional.

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Wacky Cali At It Again!

It’s said that as California goes, so goes the rest of the country. Well, maybe that USED to be the way it was…but nowadays, Cali is way out there on the fringes of reality. Need proof? Take a look at some of the laws (thanks to AP!) that are hitting the books in 2019!

Drinking Straws: Dine-in restaurants can only provide straws for your drinks if you request it.

In elections, officials must give voters a chance to “re-do” their signature if it doesn’t match what they have on file. Also, voters have the chance to “track” their ballots sent in by mail.

“Climate Change”: 60% of Cali’s energy has to come from renewable sources by 2030, which is 10% higher than previous laws. They tried this in Arizona (Tom Steyer was behind both), and it failed miserably here. California is much more amenable to high energy bills…theirs have gone up about 300% since Steyer started his war on energy.

Gender Bias: Thanks to the #MeToo movement, which has pretty much gotten off the front page elsewhere in the country because it’s been found to have been mostly made up; in Cali, if you choose to be neither male, nor female, you can actually have your driver’s license say you are an “X” gender.

Wildfires: Utility companies can actually bill their customers for future legal bills and fines resulting from the devastating 2017 wild fires, even if it’s found in the mass of lawsuits waiting to be heard, that it was the company’s fault.

Guns: If you are convicted of any domestic violence charge in Cali, you lose the right to own a gun. Also, you can never own a gun if you spend more than a year in a mental institution. And unless you’re in the military, law enforcement, or hold a hunting license, anyone under 21 is not allowed to own a gun.

Criminal Justice: You can now get out of any crime in Cali if you can show a judge that your mental state played a major role in your crime, including murder. The same goes for someone who abetted in a crime. Also, juveniles cannot be tried as an adult for any crime even murder, and if you’re under 12 you can’t be charged with anything  in the criminal justice system unless it was for murder or rape (but you still can’t be tried as an adult!).

Thanks Cali! I think I’ll just stay in Arizona!

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Matthew Whitaker’s Recusal?

First of all, and let me be as blunt as I can be here…Matthew Whitaker, Donald Trump’s interim Attorney General, should never recuse himself when it comes to the Mueller investigation. There are several reasons why, but the biggest is, he had nothing to do with it in the first place.

I actually think Jeff Sessions should never have recused himself either. However, he felt he had a conflict, and being a man of honor, he decided for himself it was best to step aside. While that’s all and good, and honorable, I would suggest that honor left the Department of Justice a LONG time ago. Let’s take a look, shall we?

Did Janet Reno ever recuse herself? Nope. Did she play politics with the Branch Dividians? Did she play politics with Elian Gonzalez? Of course she did! And yet, somehow she was above the law. What about Eric Holder? Do you think he should have recused himself into the investigations of Fast and Furious? Should he have recused himself in all of the racial violence in Ferguson, Missouri or Baltimore, or Cleveland? Should he have been slapped down for lying to Congress? Oh, he was censored, and he was voted in “contempt of Congress”, and what happened? Nothing.

What about Loretta Lynch? Do you think she REALLY recused herself during the Hillary Clinton email scandal? Do you really think it was right for a sitting Attorney General to meet with the husband of a subject under investigation, as Lynch did with Bill Clinton on the tarmac at Sky Harbor Airport in Phoenix? 

So, if all of the former Attorneys General never recused themselves for the various conflicts of interests that they faced, and politically were involved in, why in the world should Matthew Whitaker recuse himself just because some Democrat somewhere thinks he’s not in favor of the Mueller investigation? Forget it, Matthew. Do your job. Do your job to the best of your ability and get on with life.

I get really tired of whining, cry-baby snowflake Democrats who complain and call it unfair when they don’t get their way, yet they aren’t about suing over ridiculous accusations that they know aren’t true, but are meant only to obfuscate and delay. They are the biggest bunch of cry-babies around when they lose, but by God, when they win, do you think they play fair, or do they rub it in your face? You decide on that one, I already know what the truth is there!

No, Matthew Whitaker has every right to run the Mueller investigation any way he sees fit. He is capable enough to do his job and if he happens to show the least bit of political bias in his job, well, let’s just say, he’s following in the lead of the last three Democrats to hold that position. 

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Arrest John Kerry NOW!

John Kerry has always bucked the system. He did it as a Swift Boat Captain back in the Vietnam War. He did it throwing his war medals across the White House fence to protest the war once he got home. He did it as a Senator, and he did it as a presidential candidate and as the Secretary of State. Now, he’s doing it again. Only this time, it’s treasonous.

Yes…John Kerry has committed treason, and needs to be arrested and charged for the act.

Just so we are clear…here is the legal definition of treason:

Under Article III, Section 3, of the Constitution, any person who levies war against the   United States or adheres to itsenemies by giving them Aid and Comfort has committed treason within the meaning of the Constitution. The term aid andcomfort refers to any act that manifests a betrayal of allegiance to the United States, such as furnishing enemies with arms,troops, transportation, shelter, or classified information. If a subversive act has any tendency to weaken the power of theUnited States to attack or resist its enemies, aid and comfort has been given.

Now, that’s the definition. Kerry as you may or may not be aware, has visited with uppity ups in the Iranian government and told them to “wait out the Trump administration” and then the Democrats will be back in power and will re-institute the extremely ill-conceived Obama era policy of the Iran Nuclear Arms Deal that would eventually give nukes to the Iranians. Is that treason?

Well, that would mean that Kerry, by his statement has given aid and comfort to the enemy. The first question would be, is Iran an enemy of the United States? I think the obvious answer would be yes. If we don’t view them as an enemy, they certainly view us as one. Second, has Kerry given “aid and comfort” to the Iranians?  As defined, it refers to any act that manifests a betrayal of allegiance to the United States….If a subversive act has any tendency to weaken the power of the United States to attack or resist its enemies, aid and comfort have been given. I would say that while classified information hasn’t been given, certainly information that weakens the power of the United States to resist it’s enemies has.

Therefore, John Kerry should be arrested, charged with Treason and thrown in jail for the rest of his life (sorry…I’m not a fan of the death penalty…and it would be MUCH more fun to watch this idiot snowflake rot away in a 6×6 foot cell for the rest of his life and only dream of wind-surfing!).

Pure and simple, that’s it. At the very least, it would throw a HUGE scare into Kerry to realize that his overblown liberal lifestyle of the rich and famous could be taken away from him…especially if it actually was!

That would teach ’em!!

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

It’s About Time!

Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were fired from the FBI on Friday. The story was basically held over to Monday before it was released, but it couldn’t have happened to a nicer bunch of crazy idiots than these two.

Strzok maintained during his testimony to Congress that he never, ever, not even once let his personal feelings interfere with his investigations that he conducted at the FBI. Of course, he couldn’t answer why he didn’t pursue Hillary Clinton and her email scandal any harder than he did. And he couldn’t answer as to why he told Page that he’d never let Donald Trump become President. How in the world does someone at the FBI do such a thing? I didn’t know the FBI had the power to deny someone the elected position of President. Did I miss something in Civics class?

Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were dyed in the wool liberals. There’s nothing illegal about that, and they certainly had the right and the ability to get jobs at the FBI. I’m sure both are smart people in their own rights. But when you plot against someone in government, you most likely are going to have to pay the penalty at some point up the road. That was exactly what happened to Strzok and Page.

Imagine what would have happened if Hillary Clinton had actually won. Yeah, I know. I shuddered at that one as well. But they would have gotten away with this attempted coup. That’s what it was, you know, right? It was their lame attempt to overthrow a democratically elected President of the United States on the basis that they felt the wrong person won and that they didn’t think he was “qualified” to be President. Well, I guess I would say the same thing on several fronts. Was Jesse Ventura qualified to be the Governor of Minnesota?

Was Sonny Bono qualified to be a Representative from California? How about Fred Grandy? He played Gopher on The Love Boat, and he ended up being elected to Congress as well. So did baseball pitcher Jim Bunning, who served in both chambers of the US Congress from Kentucky. And was Ronald Reagan qualified to be Governor of California? Was Arnold Schwarzenegger?

No, Strzok and Page are lucky they just got fired. They should have been arrested for treason for their tweets were certainly that. They both could have been tried on that charge and at least jailed for the rest of their lives, or at worst put to death. Instead, we are finally free of that cockroach and his illicit girlfriend.

The house cleaning has begun. Hopefully it will continue until the swamp is drained of all of these liberal losers.

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Are You In The Majority?

Mark Penn made a name for himself over the last decade as Hillary Clinton’s 2008 pollster. And he’s come out with a rather interesting poll that actually, to fully disclose, I was a part of. He asked a series of questions about immigration. One of the questions that he asked was ‘Do you think notifying ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] would in fact increase crime because it would inhibit people from reporting crimes or does it decrease crimes because it takes criminals off the street’. The overwhelming response might surprise you.

84% of the respondents said it decreases crime because it takes criminals off the street.

I was flabbergasted when I read that. I remember taking that survey online, and yes… I was one of the 84%. But the mere fact that an unbelievable majority of Americans, almost 9 in 10 would like to see ICE called and illegals turned over to the authorities as opposed to what we see happening in San Francisco and Chicago and New York shows just how out of touch liberals are on the immigration issue.

Now, I’m not saying the Donald Trump’s cure for the immigration problem is 100% correct. I’m not saying that the Congress needs to come up with some bipartisan support for an immigration reform bill. What I am saying is that these guys and gals in Washington need to understand that most Americans…and overwhelming amount of Americans don’t believe in sanctuary cities, or open borders.

And it’s like the Justice Department knew it was coming. They have begun releasing hundreds of millions of dollars in grant money that will go to local police training and equipment. Unfortunately, “sanctuary cities” are going to be left out of the mix. I really can’t say that I blame the DOJ for their action. I mean, if you don’t want to be partners with the DOJ when it comes to enforcing federal laws, why in the world would you think you’d be entitled to get grant money to help your police force not enforce federal laws?

So, Los Angeles, New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Seattle, and all of those other towns that thought they were being so smart and smug deciding to buck the feds on this one will be out…millions of dollars. Let them get that money from the illegal aliens that they are protecting. I’m sure they’ll step up to the plate.

Here’s the problem. The left is so hell-bent on not allowing a Trump victory, that they are willing to do what liberals do best when they lose…they make the most idiotic, stupid, and least thought out decisions available. That’s what’s going on right now. And then you’ve got stupid, idiotic people in Congress like that walnut of a brain, Maxine Waters, that gets news coverage for making inane comments even her own leadership can’t support. And she wonders why she gets threats of violence? Really?

Sanctuary cities should be denied all federal aid because they are breaking federal law. Why in the world would you support a criminal that just robbed you and your family by giving them more money? Well, libs…you just learned a lesson in civility!

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!