EXTRA! Cuomo Resigns!

You HAD to know this was coming, right? I mean, how many women need to come forward and accuse you of sexual misconduct, groping, or outright rape? How many nursing home deaths can be laid at your feet and still have you keep your job? Andrew Cuomo resigned as Governor of New York today. It wasn’t a surprise…in fact, it was long overdue.

When it became clear that after Attorney General, Letitia James’ report was damning to the Governor’s continued presence, it was just a matter of time before Cuomo would vacate the Governor’s mansion, either by choice or by force. He took the “honorable” way out and committed hari-kari.

It’s not like we all didn’t know this was going to happen, right? I mean, you DID know he was out as Governor, one way or another after James damning investigation slammed him, right? When the President of the United States, himself a sexual predator, as well as the Majority Leader of the Senate (and a New Yorker), and the Speaker of the House of Representatives all tell you to quit, the writing is pretty much on the wall.

The question isn’t whether or not Cuomo would keep his job. The question is, how does this escapade change the way politicians behave? Cuomo isn’t the first politician to sexually abuse aides and others under him. But moving forward, will this change anything? We didn’t see any change going back throughout history. Why should this be any different? Did it change anything when Al Franken had to leave the US Senate? How about Matt Gaetz? Or John Conyers? Nothing has changed.

But Cuomo was a guy that could have very easily won the Democrat nomination for President last year. He was sitting on top of the world because of his daily COVID briefings, which were about a thousand times better than what Donald Trump was doing. He was seen as a truly rising star in the Democrat party. Just a year later, it’s all come crashing down on him, forcing him into early retirement and the end of a political career that also most likely ruined a family dynasty in the Empire State.

If it can happen to Cuomo, what do we have to do to make sure this type of thing doesn’t happen to anyone else…that they are able to avoid that trap in the first place. It doesn’t just happen to Democrats either. In fact, over the past 10 or 11 years, there have been 20 instances of politicians on both sides of the aisle that have had sexual allegations thrown at them that ended up having some truth behind it. Cuomo is just the latest example.

But the Cuomo saga has been concluded…sort of. He still could face criminal sexual abuse charges in Albany. That is being investigated by the Sheriff there. And he could still face 15,000 charges of wrongful death of one type or another over his lame-brain decision to move COVID suffers into nursing homes to infect the most vulnerable population…and then hiding it from the world, about the numbers.

Let’s hope BOTH parties learn the lesson here. I doubt it, but I can hope, can’t I?

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

The Tide Turns

As now seven women have come forward to accuse New York Governor, Andrew Cuomo of sexual harassment, it seems that the tide is turning against the Governor. Hollywood is now turning against him, and his friends in the Democrat party are joining the party. While uber-leftist fems like Elizabeth Warren and Vice President Kamala Harris have yet to say anything, President Joe Biden and Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi have both come forward and said that if the on-going investigations show that he acted inappropriately, he must resign.

Well, they ARE right of course.

Democrats are very slow to call for their own to resign unless the proof is overwhelming. They’re not as slow when it comes to those across the aisle that get accused. How many of these same people that are saying we should let the investigations continue before rushing to judgement were quick to do so against Brett Kavanaugh, even though every shred of “evidence” against him proved to be false and made up? Take the case of Anthony Weiner, who was not well liked in his party. He had many sexting scandals where he took photographs of his genitals and sent them to women prior to resigning and getting charged. And what about Al Franken? There was photographic proof that he was at least trying to feel up a celebrity on a military flight while she was sleeping. It took forever for him to admit that he was wrong and resign from the Senate.

And while, if indeed the Governor is guilty, he should certainly not only resign from office, but face criminal charges as well. But there’s something else that grinds me to the core even more than the sexual allegations, which by no means are small in stature. What I find to be totally offensive is the fact that Cuomo is responsible by his directives of sending tons of elderly people to their deaths because he ordered COVID patients to be sent to nursing homes, where the most vulnerable people were living. And then, when they got sick and sent to the hospital, he tried to cover up their deaths saying they weren’t “nursing home deaths”, they were “hospital deaths”. That in my mind is not only inexcusable, it’s criminal.

Those families that had loved ones taken from them because of his idiotic decision need to be personally compensated by him. They need to make sure that justice is done. He needs to have his massive fortune ripped from him, and divided among the families that lost loved ones because of his carelessness, and then he needs to spend the rest of his life behind bars. That was nothing short of murder.

Why in the world the sexual allegations are taking headlines away from the nursing home deaths is beyond me. Are we to the point in our society where someone forcing themselves on a member of the opposite sex is more heinous than killing off people who are frail and vulnerable? Are we saying that groping or an unwanted sexual advance of any type is worse than killing? In what universe are these people living?

Here’s the long and short of it. IF we are living in a time where you as an employer of any type are making untoward advances toward any member (male or female) of your staff, you need to be let go. If we are living in the 1950’s, as the Democrats are trying to throw out the window, that type of behavior is unacceptable and needs to be tossed to the side. Those that violate that norm should be, when found guilty, thrown out of office and dealt with harshly. As for those that have actually killed people with their policies, they need to be imprisoned and spend the rest of their lives wearing orange, and watching very carefully what happens when they are in the shower!

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Leftist Feminists Need To Get Serious

I get very irked when someone makes a comment regarding someone in the other political party, or another ideology, slamming them for something. And then when the very same thing happens to someone in their party, they take an entirely different tone.

Let’s take the example of what happened when Brett Kavanaugh was wrongly accused of sexual harassment at his confirmation hearings a few years back, and what’s happening now to the embattled Governor of New York.

In fact, let’s start with the Governor of New York, shall we? In 2018, during the height of the trumped up charges against Kavanaugh by Christine Blasey Ford, Cuomo had this to say:

“Here is one basic fact that badly hurts Judge Kavanaugh: Why won’t he take a polygraph? Dr. Ford did. If he does not take a polygraph test, it is the ultimate, ‘he said, she said.’ “

And here’s what he says now about his own situation: “I wasn’t elected by politicians, I was elected by the people of the state of New York. I’m not going to resign.” He has been repeatedly asked if he would take a lie detector test, like he demanded Kavanaugh to do less than three years ago. He has never answered.

But I would expect a politician to play the “Clinton game” of denying everything. What about politicians at the very core of the #MeToo movement? What did they say about Kavanaugh’s false allegations, and then about Cuomo’s (which have yet to be proven true in all fairness).

Kamala Harris, current Vice President of the United States, was a Senator during Kavanaugh’s confirmation. “Christine Blasey Ford courageously stepped forward to tell her story — it is a credible and serious allegation. The Senate has a constitutional responsibility to scrutinize SCOTUS nominees. A vote on Kavanaugh’s nomination must be delayed until there is a thorough investigation.” And to be honest, I think a full investigation is always necessary in these instances, but Harris was quick to believe the accuser. What has she said about any of Cuomo’s accusers? Crickets. Nada. Silence. No call for an investigation. No saying that the accusers (six of them) are courageous for stepping forward to tell their story. No “it is a credible and serious allegation.” It wasn’t even true, yet the mere thought it COULD be true was enough back then. Apparently not so today!

And let’s look at another feminist Senator. Elizabeth Warren has been a long-time advocate of women’s rights. Here is part of what she said on the floor of the United States Senate on October 4, 2018: “Dr. Ford’s account of the most traumatic event of her life was harrowing. The pain of retelling this story was evident. And she did it for no personal gain whatsoever. In fact, her life has been turned upside down as a result of her decision to come forward. The courage she showed was remarkable. Dr. Ford’s testimony was credible and compelling. I believe Dr. Ford.”

Now, let’s see what Elizabeth Warren has to say when the same allegations of sexual misconduct get leveled against someone in her own party…namely, Andrew Cuomo. Again, crickets…nada…silence. That’s because this woman that was so in the court of Christine Blasey Ford, who threw unsubstantiated claims against Brett Kavanaugh, won’t even say that the threat was credible, the event traumatic, the pain so personal. We get nothing out of her.

I hope there is a full investigation into these salacious allegations facing Cuomo. It’s wrong to let any accuser, of any time pronounce guilt upon anybody. But it’s equally wrong to rush to the aid of someone that politically you agree with, and pull a Hillary Clinton just because someone is talking about someone in your own party, who you tend to agree with ideologically. I expect Andrew Cuomo to deny the allegations. Maybe he did them, maybe he didn’t. I wasn’t there, I can’t say either way. Just as Cuomo, Harris, and Warren weren’t there to witness Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations against Brett Kavanaugh. But if you’re going to come to the aid of a woman in one case, shouldn’t you come to the aid of the woman in ALL cases?

It’s the inconsistencies that kill liberals. And it will kill them in this case as well if Cuomo is found to have been a bad boy!

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

NYT Gets Into The Comedy Business

The Grand Old Lady of journalism hit a new low over the weekend. The New York Times, whose motto has always been “all the news that’s fit to print” ran an editorial that bordered on something you’d find in The Onion.

They called for the Democrat National Committee to put together an “unbiased, apolitical panel” to investigate the sexual shenanigans of one Joe Biden. So, you have to wonder if the Times editorial board has decided to take the show on the road…you know…maybe show up at one of the many comedy clubs in the greater New York City area (once they open up again), and start polishing an act.

All sorts of journalists, and we’re not talking about the “fake news” specialists here, but REAL journalists, mocked the Times for making such a ludicrous statement. I don’t think anybody with half a brain would have taken such a comment as serious. Certainly the DNC didn’t. Here’s what the DNC’s response was:

“This is an absurd suggestion on the face. Regardless of whether it’s the job of the DNC to do this kind of thing, it’s already been done. Joe Biden has been clear in responding to this allegation, he went through a thorough vetting process to be Obama’s Vice President in 2008 (which is a vetting process like no other)and lawyers and the press found nothing, and he has asked for transparency by requesting that all relevant documents be released if they exist.”

Now, that statement says volumes about this whole process. Would anyone with half a brain have expected Joe Biden to come clean and say that yes…he raped this woman in the basement of the United States Capitol and that he had an on-going sexual abuse problem? Would anyone disagree that the press and “lawyers” vetting Biden back in 2008 missed something if this certainly did exist? And by the way…just how good is the DNC at “vetting” Vice Presidents? Does anyone remember the name of Thomas Eagleton? How much vetting was done on that one?

I think the most interesting statement comes at the end where the DNC says that Biden has asked for “transparency by requesting that all relevant documents be released if they exist. That tells me that yes, Biden’s staff has been to the University of Delaware and has scrubbed any offending documentation. I mean, would a presidential candidate say something like that if there was the slightest chance such a document would indeed exist?

For the New York Times to come out and even suggest that a political party, I don’t care which political party you choose, could, at this late date, put together an unbiased and apolitical group to vet their presumptive nominee, since he’s the only one left running, is ridiculous. I don’t know what kind of drugs they are taking at the editorial board meetings of the New York Times, but they must have a great pipeline into South America!

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Dems Consider A “Smoke Filled Room” Convention

It hasn’t happened since before the state-by-state primaries became popular. Back in the 1960s (1968 to be precise), the Democrats were in Chicago and had a horrible convention. That, you’ll recall, was where the Weathermen, the SDS, and all of the riots occurred. It was after that convention that George McGovern led a panel that decided more states should choose their own delegates. By 1992, some 40 states were using primaries for the Dems and 39 for the Republicans. That ushered in the end of the “smoke-filled rooms”, where people went to the convention and basically were told what the deal was and who they’d be voting for as their nominee.

And we could be heading back to that for the Democrats this summer!

It’s a long shot, admittedly. But here’s the way Democrats are starting to look at their prospects this year. You have a very senior party member in Joe Biden, who’s demonstrated questionable mental acuity, has for decades been a gaffe machine on the campaign trail, and now is hit with what appears to be a rather substantial, and provable sexual abuse allegation from a former staff member. There’s no doubt that the records of her time in his office have been scrubbed, as it’s been reported all over the news that Biden staffers have visited the University of Delaware, where the records of his time in the Senate and as VP are being held, though sealed.

The problem that Democrats have is, they were so gung-ho to find anything to hang on Brett Kavanaugh during his Supreme Court nomination hearings, they basically set the standard of “you must believe the accuser” when Christine Blasey Ford stepped forward with a made-up story of a high school rape. As so often happens with Democrats, they play the short game, for the moment, and that’s what they did then. Two years later, when the same type of thing happens to one of their own, there are all sorts of evidence of them screaming that they need to believe the woman, and at the very least investigate it.

So, what’s stopping them now? Well, it’s again, going to be a “he-said-she-said” moment, but Tara Reade has a lot more proof on her side. She has a police report that has been filed. Her mother got through to one of Larry King’s talk shows and voiced it on the air. There were no other witnesses, but people were told about it, and believed it because it was commonplace in the Biden office at the time. It’s a much more damning situation than what Kavanaugh went through because of all of that.

So, do the Democrats decide before, during, or after the convention that Biden isn’t their guy? Do they replace him with maybe an Andrew Cuomo? After all, 56% of Democrats surveyed said they’d rather have Cuomo at the head of the ticket than Biden… especially after the Coronavirus escapade.

In the end, nothing will happen. Biden will be the nominee. Trump will eat him alive in the presidential debates, and between the gaffes, the past slimy history, and now a sexual allegation that won’t go away, and the Democrats only real response is, “Joe Biden IS Joe Biden”, or that the Republicans are trying to smear him, it won’t be close.

Donald Trump is looking, even with the “bleach as a cure for Coronavirus” snafu, like he will be elected in November.

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Democrats Circle The Wagons

I’ve recently noticed a pattern with Democrats. When there is bad news out there, they circle the wagons like nobody’s business. It didn’t always use to be this way. One of the things I always did credit Bill Clinton on, was his belief that when there was bad news, you released it first, before anybody could “control” the story. At least it got released!

When Bobo Obama was running for president, all of that changed. It became a game of hide and seek. First it was his birth certificate from Hawaii. Of course, when it was eventually revealed, several people, including Donald Trump, and my former sheriff, Joe Arpaio, came out and said it was fake. I attended one of Arpaio’s briefings on that, and his forensics folks were extremely thorough in their explanation.

Then you had the whole admission and college records thing going on with Bobo. His college records were sealed. You couldn’t (and still can’t) see them. Why would that be? What is so important to the national security of our country that you couldn’t look at someone’s college application or grades when they want to be president?

And today, the same thing is happening with Joe Biden. Here’s a guy that served in the United States Senate for 36 years. Yet, if you try to look at his Senate records, now being housed at the University of Delaware, you’ll find that officials there are refusing to release those records. So, it begs the question, what is Biden hiding?

Well, one thing is that could be contained is the story of his alleged rape and sexual abuse of Tara Reade, a former aide in his office. But there are others, to be sure. Biden sold his house in 1996 to the University’s Board Chairman for “top dollar”, indicating that maybe it wasn’t “fair market value”, but a highly inflated price?

Originally, the University said that it would release all 1,875 boxes of photographs, documents, videotapes, files, and 415 gigs of electronic records two years after Joe Biden retired from public life. That would have been January 20, 2018. That didn’t happen. In fact, in April of last year, when Biden announced he was going to run for President, the University of Delaware decided they would delay the release until December 31, 2019, “or two years after Biden retired from public service”.

So what is the University hiding?

And while we’re discussing hiding all things bad about Joe Biden, why hasn’t the mainstream snowflake media talked about this Tara Reade assault? Nary any of the networks, CNN, MSNBC, or the New York Times has touched the story. Anyone want to offer a guess as to why? My thought is, if it’s Brett Kavanaugh, and some woman from forty years ago decides to trump up a charge against him, it’s front page news. But if Biden actually does rape someone, and does it in the basement of the United States Capitol building, they need to bury it. Thank God there are actual journalists out there, some of the even on the far left, that are upset enough about this that they want the truth to come out!

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

What A Difference Two Years Makes

I want you to think back about two years or so ago. Remember the furror that erupted over Brett Kavanaugh? Remember there was this woman who said he raped her at a party in high school? And remember that no one could corroborate the story? Remember how the Democrats were all up in arms about “the seriousness of the charge” and that was enough to stop him from being a Supreme Court Justice?

What the hell has happened to the Democrat party in the past two years?

Today, their presumptive presidential nominee, one Joeseph Robinette Biden, Jr., has been accused by a former staffer named Tara Reade that he sexually assaulted her. Now, two years ago, it was the “seriousness of the charge” against Kavanaugh that forced Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer to drop everything and race to this woman’s (Christine Blasey Ford) defense, despite the fact that the allegation was over 40 years old, and that there was no evidence or witnesses around to support it, and that Ford never said anything to anyone about it until Kavanaugh was nominated. I have but one simple question.

Where are Pelosi and Schumer now?

Here are the people that swore up and down that Brett Kavanaugh wasn’t qualified to become a Justice on the highest court in the land because of an unsubstantiated allegation with no corroborating proof. Here we have a woman that has screamed about this since it happened back in the late 1970’s, and we’ve got tons of proof of Smilin’ Joe touching, hugging, and kissing women who obviously didn’t want the advances, and we don’t have the same response from ANY Democrat in either the House or the Senate?

Go ahead, and try and tell me that the Democrats aren’t trying to play politics with this one. Progressives of the party, and people involved in the #MeToo movement are clamoring about this, wanting to have something done to Biden. At the very least, he shouldn’t be allowed to run for office. After all, if the mere suggestion of sexual allegation was enough to try and keep Brett Kavanaugh off the Supreme Court bench, shouldn’t a sexual allegation charge against a candidate for President of the United States at the very least be investigated by the Senate, as was Kavanaugh?

Democrats are losing on this one. There is nothing that upsets me more than inconsistency for political reasons. And Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and every single Democrat serving in the United States Congress should be ashamed of themselves for having spoken out against Brett Kavanaugh over allegations that were proven to be totally false, and yet wanting to turn a deaf ear toward Joe Biden’s sexual dalliances.

This stinks of the highest disregard for justice. It ranks up there with Hillary Clinton not being charged for her federal crimes as Secretary of State. And trust me, voters will not forget come November.

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

The Epstein Conundrum

It is one of the most talked about topics on the internet these days. And frankly, I really don’t care about it all that much. But the conspiracy theories abound about “Who Killed Jeffrey Epstein?”. First of all, was he killed or was it actually suicide?

Like the Kennedy assassination or the Hillary Clinton email scandal, we may never know. I’ve seen several people on the talking head shows on TV swear up and down that in that particular prison, there is no way in the world to “hang yourself” because there isn’t anything to attach anything that could exert that much pressure on the neck to.

The sheets in that prison are made of paper. There are towels, there certainly wasn’t any rope and there’s nowhere to hang the rope even if you had it. And then I see an “expert” that says that anyone can hang themselves by exerting 7 pounds of pressure on the right area of the neck. Who knew?

The right thinks that it’s another in the long line of Clinton murders, and that it wasn’t “suicide”, it was “Arkancide”, a throwback to all of the people that wronged the Clinton’s the mysteriously disappeared and/or were found to have died some how. The left thinks it was Donald Trump. Of course they do!

Here’s the thing I don’t get. Jeffrey Epstein was supposed to be this Wall Street wizard. But, there is no record of him ever trading a single share of stock. He was never seen working anywhere, so how did he get over $500 million as a net worth? One theory says he took the high and mighty (including Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew) to his private island for sex with underaged girls. Then he would extort huge sums of money from them. Other theories say he would befriend people like the guy that dreamed up Victoria’s Secret, and who supposedly gave Epstein a private plane and a building in Manhattan. It’s never been confirmed either way.

And so, the latest conspiracy theories will live on probably forever. Or at least until the next suspicious activity occurs. Frankly, my life-long belief that the wheels of justice grind very slowly but very fine holds true today. And it will hold true into the future. Call it karma, call it fate, call it God’s will, call it whatever you want. I’ve seen it happen time and time again, in my life and in others, where people that do wrong end up having to pay for it. I guess in a way, justice was served in this case, though it probably wasn’t as satisfying for the victims as they hoped…it rarely is.

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Hogwash!

Have we sunk to the new low that all you have to do to uncork an outstanding nomination to the US Supreme Court is to come up with some cock-n-bull story about high school dalliances? That’s why Senator Diane Feinstein has done by outing this Stanford University professor who is claiming that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh groped her (and according to her, would have raped her had he not been so drunk). I have one word for this whole kettle of fish.

Hogwash!

First of all, it smacks of Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill…to the point that Hill was also a college professor. Second, as in Thomas’ case, it was held until just before the vote. And third, unlike the Thomas case, it was a Senator that brought it to the forefront and outed the accuser. This really reeks of something bad I’m smelling.

Let’s look at it. Why are we only now hearing of this? Why, if this woman has been so tormented throughout her life didn’t she come forward when Kavanaugh was before the Senate for confirmation to the Federal Bench? If this was such a huge ordeal, why does this woman not have one soul that can also remember the incident? And let’s face it… it was supposedly happening 35 years ago when she and Kavanaugh were in high school. Are you kidding me? The FBI has vetted this guy and plowed into his past looking at everything he ever did not once, not twice or three times, but SIX separate times. They have turned over every rock. They have looked under every leaf. Hell, this guy is the squeakiest clean boy scout if there ever was one.

How can hundreds of women that he dated in high school, and college, and since his education, while a legal professional come forward and say that he has always been upstanding and treated them well.

And now we learn that this professor is a dyed in the wool snowflake who’s taken part in anti-Trump marches, signed petitions about separating children from their parents at the border, and has been a staunch donor of extremely liberal campaigns for not just a year or two…we’re talking decades.

The other problem I had with this is the fact that her lawyer seems to be as partisan as she is. While she rails against Brett Kavanaugh being such a bad person and trying to “rape” her client 35 years ago, she fails to mention that she was wanting to give Bill Clinton and yes, even Al Franken a pass on their sexual dalliances. Now wait a minute! If you’re such a fan of the #MeToo movement, and I’m not saying that’s a bad thing, how can you call it OK when a Democrat does commits sex abuse when there are plenty of witnesses, and go on the offensive when your client has NO witnesses, is a dyed in the wool liberal who’d do anything to see this guy not get confirmed, and it supposedly happened in HIGH SCHOOL? C’mon…can’t you get more creative than that?

You couldn’t have written a better script for a “gotcha” moment than this. And now the GOP has to hold this insane hearing next Monday to listen to this woman’s testimony. This has all the trappings of the typical Democrat “win at all cost, even if it’s a lie” mentality. The least they could do is come up with a different play, rather than some 27 year old play that led to absolutely nothing except Thomas’ confirmation.

Feinstein should be investigated and impeached!

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

#MeToo Movement Has Clinton To Thank

Do you remember when Bill Clinton was the most glib, most polished public speaker in the world? This guy could talk his way out of jail (and did so several times!). There wasn’t anything he worried about because he always seemed to say the right thing at the right moment. Apparently, with old age comes a certain, shall we say, forgetfulness on how to do that.

Bill Clinton has become a bumbling idiot.

His recent Today Show interview is a shining example of that. Trying to tell the world that he apologized to everyone (except personally to Monica) for his affair with her, and that you know…looking back at everything he was right all along. Huh?

Clinton has done more to prod and push the #MeToo movement than Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein put together. Yet, Democrats, while gently telling everyone he shouldn’t have done what he did, refuse to lump him into the same category as Cosby and Weinstein. They’re wrong on that. He’s cut from the same cloth.

I don’t have a lot of respect for people that can’t be faithful. I don’t have a lot of respect especially for leaders who can’t set a good example. I’m not saying as a leader you have to follow the law, and morality. I’m saying as a leader, you have to be above the law. And I know where my liberal friends are going right now…but Donald Trump hasn’t always been faithful either.

You’re absolutely right.

And Donald Trump, as far as we know, hasn’t had sex in the oval office with interns either, right? He hasn’t used a cigar as a sex toy. And I don’t recall seeing any articles or news stories of The Donald staining any blue dresses. Did I miss something on that one?

The fact of the matter is, with the mainstream media so biased these days, if Trump even looked at a woman wrong, they’d be all over it. So how is it that the same people that seem to want to give Bill Clinton a pass because “it was a different time”, are willing to throw anyone under the bus that had any sort of illicit sex with someone (male or female).

This goes to the heart of why I write this blog. It’s called inconsistency. It doesn’t fit their political narrative to have the guy they worship like conservatives worship Ronald Reagan to be smeared with the taint of a sex scandal, even if that was the defining moment in his presidency. And yes, I know, he did a lot of other stuff in his term, but if you look back, and history will eventually see this, the defining moment was not NAFTA, and was not welfare reform, and was not a booming dot com economy. It was Monica.

Bill Clinton should be painted with the same brush that Cosby and Weinstein are. If we can say that Columbus was garbage because he stole the Native American’s land (which is false), and killed and murdered everybody in his path, changing history centuries later, we can certainly change history and paint what happened with Bill Clinton some 25 years ago. It wasn’t a different time. Illicit sex is still illicit sex. And I’d love to argue that one with any liberal out there.

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!