The Biggest Fool

Today is April Fool’s Day. And to celebrate our biggest fool in recent memory, I go back to this past Friday. When it was announced that the United States had surpassed China for having the most cases of Coronavirus, former two-time presidential candidate loser, Hillary Clinton tweeted, “Well…he (Trump) said he would put America first”.

What an incredibly sad, sad end to what could have been a positive career. Here you’ve got a woman that for most of her life had been celebrated, had been hailed as having no barriers, as being a woman of tomorrow and someone every little girl could look up to. And now, she has sunk to the utter depths of being this country’s biggest fool. Bigger than Barack Obama, who single-handedly almost destroyed our economy, and our way of life. Bigger than Joe Biden, who has stumbled and bumbled his way to the presumptive nomination on the Democrat side, even though it’s obvious there is some mental incapacity going on there. Bigger than even her husband, who had to display to the world his inabilty to keep his sex addiction to himself.

For Hillary Clinton to once again, try to become relevant in today’s world, to have to tweet such a foolish, obnoxious, and reprehensible comment, and make it public? It tells me one very certain thing. America can breathe a sigh of relief that the 2016 presidential election did not go the other way.

My response to Hillary’s ill-timed tweet was: You know, your tweet about Donald Trump isn’t funny. It’s sad. America is grateful you didn’t win the presidency. Time for Hillary to crawl back into her bottle of Chardonnay!

I frankly don’t expect her to respond to it, or even see it. That wasn’t my point. At a time when the United States is trying to get over the largest pandemic of our lifetime, for a “leader” to come out with such a blatant idiotic post is morally reprehensible.

Quite honestly, China has stopped testing, so a country that’s four times the size of the United States, isn’t able to give numbers that are anywhere near accurate. In fact, do you really trust the numbers China has given out regarding COVID-19 at all? I certainly don’t! It wouldn’t surprise me if they have had a million or more deaths from this disease, not just the 82,000 cases that they admit to having. And for some supposed person that has been at the top of government to come out with such an inane statement is beyond the pale.

No, Hillary Clinton is a fool. She has earned that title. She will never again be relevant in any conversation. She should slink back to whatever rock she crawled out of when she got knocked up by Bill and bury herself. She isn’t worthy of a Twitter account, and we shouldn’t have to be exposed to her nonsense. She is America’s Fool!

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Can Biden Go The Distance?

It’s no longer a question of whether or not Joe Biden has the money or the Big Mo to go the distance in the marathon known as the Democrat Nomination Primary. It’s now a question of does he have a) the stamina, and b) the mental capacity to finish the race?

The party came to Joe’s rescue before Super Tuesday, after Jim Clyburn endorsed him just prior to the South Carolina primary. And after Buttigieg and Klobuchar dropped out, it meant the Biden was the only real candidate left that was considered a moderate. I say “real candidate” because I really don’t think anyone in the Democrat party ever thought of Michael Bloomberg as a “real candidate”, much like the Republicans probably didn’t look at Donald Trump as a “real candidate” four years ago. Bloomberg was an after thought.

So, it’s Biden and Sanders for the nomination. Does this sound vaguely familiar to four years ago, when Marty O’Malley dropped out of the race and slinked back to Maryland leaving Bernie and Hillary to battle it out? And had the Democrat National Committee (read that as Little Debbie Wasserman-Schultz) and Donna Brazile not come to her rescue, Hillary probably would have lost out to Bernie is a totally fair primary. Same thing with Joe this year. Had it not been for Tom Perez making sure the path was clear for the former veep, Bernie would have swept Super Tuesday, and gone on to the nomination.

Just look at what’s been happening since. Joe Biden (and Amy Klobuchar) drew about 300 people in Detroit at a rally. Meanwhile, Bernie Sanders spoke on the shores of Lake Michigan in Chicago, and there were an estimated 15,000 people there. This is 2016 all over again!

As far as stamina goes, I think Joe is slowing down. His speeches are becoming rambling diatribes, and he’s screwing up with more and more gaffes. He recently said that “we need to re-elect Donald Trump”. That was so out of left field that the White House sent it out as a Tweet. Of course, Twitter immediately said that the video had been “manipulated”. And the White House shot back that it hadn’t. Joe doesn’t look all that healthy (and compare that to four years ago with Hillary getting helped into a van!). He also has been gaffe prone, asking people to vote on Super Thursday, declaring that he was running for the US Senate, confusing his wife and his sister on Super Tuesday in California. It’s a really interesting turn…and one has to wonder who is going to be his vice presidential pick. That’s going to sway a LOT of Democrats, because it’s pretty evident that Joe Biden isn’t going to make it in the White House pressure cooker called the Oval Office for four years.

I really wonder whether Biden has the stuff to make it. And I’m not alone. Pundits, columnists, reporters, and mainstream Democrats are wondering whether or not Sleepy Joe has the ability to go the distance in this fight. And you can bet that if the pundits on the left are asking the question, the folks over at the DNC have already been talking about it. And yet, they continue to throw the nomination Biden’s way, regardless what the Bernie crowds think.

Somehow, the more we get down this nomination path, with all of the changes Democrats made to make sure that 2016 didn’t happen again, we’re looking at the same race all over again!

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Bloomberg’s Problems

I told you this past weekend about the problems with Bernie Sanders becoming the nominee for president on the Democrats’ side of things. But as Michael Bloomberg is gaining momentum, he seems to be stepping in it quite a bit! Let’s look at that.

First of all, you’ve got the old “Pay To Play” problem. Democrats are not happy with the fact that Mini Mike is throwing, at this point, upwards of $300 million at his campaign, and said he wouldn’t mind throwing over a billion at it! That has a lot of folks talking about him “buying the election”, which doesn’t sit well with most Americans. And while I think Bloomberg is going to do OK in some of the Super Tuesday states, and I can tell you he’s buying airtime left and right out here in the desert, where our primary isn’t until March 17th (a month from today). I’m already hearing from Democrats and Republicans alike that they don’t like the fact he could buy the White House.

Secondly, he’s got a race problem. Rudy Giuliani came out with “Stop and Frisk” back when he was Mayor of New York. Bloomberg came after Giuliani, and kept the practice going. You’ve read by now some of the stuff Bloomberg said about it…how most of the crime was in the minority neighborhoods, so that’s where the police should be…and that the MO (Modus Operandi) of those that murder and get murdered are pretty much non-whites between the ages of 16 and 28 or something like that. How do you think that’s going to sit with the minority voters in California? Or New York? Or here in the desert southwest?

Now, Bloomberg comes at a third problem. At a time when most Democrats are tired of the Clintons, and sick and tired of hearing Hillary complain about how she “beat Trump, and yet he’s in the White House”, Mike decides that she could just be a great running mate for him. That in and of itself, would upset a lot of Democrats, though I’m sure the Republicans would love to see Hillary lose yet another election! There is one small fly in the ointment of that. Under the 12th Amendment, the President and Vice President cannot be from the same state. Remember back in 2000? George W. Bush had been the Governor of Texas, so there was no question he lived there. His running mate was Dick Cheney, who in 1995 moved to Dallas to become head of Halliburton. It was challenged in court, but the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the case because Cheney was from Wyoming and had maintained a residence there (and represented Wyoming in Congress).

Either way, when you add up the baggage that Bloomberg brings to the table, and the fact he really hasn’t been vetted by voters yet since he hasn’t participated in any debates, it’s going to be interesting to watch him burn through a billion dollars of his own money only to slink back to the Big Apple with his tail between his legs!

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Meanwhile, Back On The Trail…

Democrats are just praying that Hillary Clinton will go away. It seems every time the Democrat Party is primed to move past the dynamic duo of extra marital affairs, scandals, and scams, something pulls them back together again. This time it was an interview in the Hollywood Reporter for her upcoming mini-series on Hulu, which airs in March.

Hillary, never one to pull a punch except when she’s running against Donald Trump said about Bernie Sanders, “Nobody likes him, nobody wants to work with him, he got nothing done,” Clinton said. “He was a career politician. It’s all just baloney and I feel so bad that people got sucked into it.”

That raised the eyebrows of more than one upper level Democrat. Of course, people in the Clinton camp said that it was all Bernie’s fault because he really didn’t come to her aid and help her win the presidency as his backers sat home rather than vote for her. Bernie’s side, and most Democrats for that matter, say that she was to blame for losing a very winnable election, and she’s still trying to come to terms with how she could have been so badly whooped by a neophyte politician.

I will give Sanders some credit on this one. When they asked him to respond, his comment was, “Look, Hillary Clinton is certainly entitled to her own opinions. But, my focus today is on a monumental moment in American history: the impeachment trial of Donald Trump,” Sanders said. “Together, we are going to go forward and defeat the most dangerous president in American history.”

So, my point, and it’s been my point since January 20, 2017 is simply, why is anyone still listening to Hillary Clinton? Why is anyone in Hollywood interested in doing a mini-series on her for cryin’ out loud? She’s a loser. Did we do a mini-series on John McCain, or Mitt Romney or Michael Dukakis after they got their rear ends whipped? The answer is no…we didn’t. Nobody cared. So why should anybody care about what Hillary Clinton thinks of anything? Yes, Bernie’s right in that she’s entitled to her own opinion, but her opinion and $3 will get you a grande coffee at Starbucks.

And why in the world would she come out now when the news media is all excited about impeachment, covering this most boring display, gavel to gavel? Did she really think her interview would hurt Donald Trump? It actually helped him! It took everyone’s attention, if only for a few brief moments, off the soap opera being played out in the Senate, and shoved her front and center in front of everyone.

Of course, this isn’t going to change anything. Hillary Clinton isn’t going to win any election any time in the future. She’s not going to influence enough people to not vote for Bernie Sanders, and her mini-series on Hulu will go the way of her live show with hubby Bill…it bombed. This will air for a month or two on Hulu, and will be around as they try to recoup the cost of producing it, but will die shortly thereafter; probably for reruns of MASH or some such program that will be more valuable to the typical Hulu viewer. And Hillary Clinton can once again, slink back inside her case of Chardonnay!

Carry on world…you’re dismissed

But Is She CRAZY?

Since Hillary Clinton decided to thrust herself back into the political spotlight, calling one of the “other” candidates for the Democrat nomination “a Russian asset” (read that as a Russian spy), she’s managed to upset the entire Democrat party. In fact, most of the candidates for the Democrat nomination are rushing to Tulsi Gabbard’s defense. Even Donald Trump called Clinton “crazy” during an interview with Sean Hannity the other night.

But is she crazy?

It hit me that the Clinton’s typically don’t do anything that’s not measured, focused, and well thought out. So, if Clinton is going to hit someone up with an accusation that they are a Russian spy hell-bent on making sure Donald Trump wins re-election, you have to wonder about that one. And I do wonder about that one!

Tulsi Gabbard certainly isn’t someone I would ever have suspected of being a Russian spy. Yes, she met with Bahsir al Assad in Syria. Yes, she’s come out against the military she once served in. But a spy for Russia? To insure that Donald Trump gets re-elected? That seems a bit much to me.

And so I have to ask myself if Donald Trump wasn’t right in calling Hillary crazy. I mean, let’s face it…when some Democrats that feel they are “entitled” to win the White House actually lose, they go into hiding for a while, then they get better after a few months and reemerge in society in one way or another. Al Gore felt he was destined for glory, and that ended when he lost the state of Florida by 500 or so votes. He was morose, got divorced, grew a beard, gained a ton of weight, and became the world’s spokesman for climate change.

Then you’ve got the story of John Kerry…another Democrat who felt he was owed the White House. He went into hiding for a little longer than Gore did, and only came out to try and defend his Iran Nuclear Arms Deal. Since then, you really haven’t heard much from Kerry…but he’s ok…living off of Theresa Heinz Kerry’s money.

Hillary is different. She felt from a very young age that she was destined to become president. It’s why she married Bill in the first place. They were going to become the first “presidential couple” where both husband and wife got elected. The polls late in the race showed that she would achieve that success…and yet she lost. She still today hasn’t accepted her defeat, stating at a recent interview, “I beat Trump before, I can beat him again!”

Huh?

If you beat him before, why are you not in the White House? It’s because we elect people by the Electoral College in this country, not the popular vote. And you lost the Electoral College vote, so you lost. And I have this sneaky suspicion that if Hillary Clinton ran again, she’d lose again, probably worse this time than last. The world has moved on, but in Hillary’s mind it’s still 2016.

Is Hillary crazy? I’m not psychiatrist, but she’s sure showing signs of some sort of mental illness. And she has made rather stern accusations against both Gabbard, and Green Party candidate Jill Stein. And she’s shown no proof of either actually being foreign agents of any country. In the end, Hillary Clinton will be a blip in history, and labeled both the worst candidate in US presidential history, and a very, very sore loser.

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

The Claws Come Out…

Yeah…we’re looking at a good old fashioned cat fight here. Tulsi Gabbard, who apparently I didn’t do any research on, has been accused a LOT by a lot of different people of being a Russian asset. And it took Democrat has-been, Hillary Clinton in a podcast with David Plouffe (a podcast? She’s sinking to podcasts?) to bring it to the light of day.

And now, Tulsi Gabbard is fighting back. She’s starting to point out all of the people and all of the times she’s getting hammered on this accusation. She calls it a smear campaign from the “Democrat power elite”. Somehow I would disagree with her. I’m sure Hillary would love to believe she’s still powerful, but I think she’s gotten into one too many bottles of Chardonnay!

And maybe that goes to the root of the problem here. Hillary seems to be the one closer to the Russians than anyone. After all, who paid Bill Clinton $500,000 when she was Secretary of State for a half-hour speaking engagement? Who bought our country’s uranium supply (and who sold it)? Who came up with the Russian collusion scam on Donald Trump? Who paid Christopher Steele to write that phony dossier? Seems to me that Hillary has a LOT more ties to Russia than someone that probably couldn’t beat ME in an independent run for the White House!

If I were a Russian in charge of screwing up the 2020 presidential election, do you think I’d go for someone like a Jill Stein, or a Tulsi Gabbard? I would have thought the Libertarian Party candidates (Gary Johnson and Bill Weld) would have been a LOT tougher on the Republicans than a lowly Green Party run. And that turned out to be the truth! Are we really to believe that Russia is that stupid that they are going to screw up our election with someone getting 1.2% in the Real Clear Politics average of polls (putting her tenth!)? Idiotic, drunken thinking, Hillary!

First of all, Russia would choose someone with like minded thinking like Elizabeth Warren. And they’d choose someone that would actually win the damn election so they could have puppet regime like control. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if Hillary Clinton wasn’t the actual Russian asset in 2016, and she’s just using this cat fight to take the spotlight of it off of her and foist it on someone else. That seems about the way the Clintons like to run things, doesn’t it?

Look, I am enjoying this cat fight between one has-been and one never-was. In the end, it doesn’t matter because neither of them are worth a hill of beans (no pun intended). It will most likely be Donald Trump and Elizabeth Warren fighting it out a year from now. And the rest, as they say…will be a Trump second term.

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Cat Fight!

There’s a whole story about cat fights in Seinfeld…the old TV sitcom. It has to do when two women are fighting each other, and the theory goes men like watching it because there’s a chance the two women will eventually kiss. Well, I don’t think that’s going to happen here. But what is becoming clear is the whole “Russian collusion” thing was foisted on the wrong party. Apparently, it was Hillary behind the whole thing. Here’s her comment:

“I’m not making any predictions, but I think they’ve got their eye on somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate,” Clinton said. “She’s the favorite of the Russians.”

Gabbard responded with this gem:

Tulsi Gabbard@TulsiGabbard

Great! Thank you @HillaryClinton. You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain. From the day I announced my candidacy, there has been a …. concerted campaign to destroy my reputation. We wondered who was behind it and why. Now we know — it was always you, through your proxies and … powerful allies in the corporate media and war machine, afraid of the threat I pose.
It’s now clear that this primary is between you and me. Don’t cowardly hide behind your proxies. Join the race directly.

So, THIS cat fight is on!

And here’s what I find to be very interesting about all of this…IF Hillary has such knowledge about the Russians using Tulsi as a “bot” as she calls it, and IF Hillary has such knowledge of Jill Stein being another Russian asset, as she called her, why isn’t Hillary being charged with something rather than Donald Trump? It’s apparent that Hillary knows a lot more about what’s going on in Russia that Trump or pretty much anybody else if she can accuse a presidential candidate from the left of then working as a Russian asset in order to insure Donald Trump’s reelection.

So, I have to beg the question…HOW does Hillary know all of this stuff? HOW does she come up with this? Is her Chardonnay salesman that delivers two cases of wine to her house in New York every week a Russian spy? Or is Hillary a Russian spy? Something like that has to be true.

Frankly, it’s the first time I’ve heard anything about Russian meddling to help Trump this time around. And if it’s coming from the same person that paid off folks to get a phony Trump dossier tying him to Russia the last time around, I can’t help but believe there is something there. At least, where there’s smoke, there’s fire, isn’t that what Adam Schiff says?

So, my over riding question here is, when is Schiff going to start hearings on Hillary Clinton? When is William Barr going to file charges of espionage, and treason against her? And when will the American people see justice finally done?

I’m waiting….so are you!

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!